The Cleveland Cavaliers didn’t just dismantle the Miami Heat, they humiliated them in every which way. In fact, Cleveland set an NBA record for the largest point differential for a single series, outscoring them by 122 points–including by 92 points in the final two games.
During the Heat’s end-of-season press conference on Wednesday, Anderson was asked about what flipped after Game 2–where Miami nearly completed a second-half comeback against the East’s No. 1 seed.
And his answer was fascinating. The veteran forward was quick to point out that the Cavaliers were best without their second-best guard: Darius Garland.
“(The Cleveland Cavaliers) looked like a better team without [Darius Garland] on the floor,” Anderson said. “I don’t know the numbers or anything. I think it played more into their favor once Garland wasn’t on the floor for them. They were able to dictate the tempo, get more stops on defense, it was hard for us to score. They had more guys out there on defense. Once we came across that, it made it tough for us.
“Every series is different. I’m not saying they’re better without Garland. He’s obviously a really good player. I respect his game. But I think that was tough on us.”
Garland missed Games 3 and 4 with a sprained left toe, and it obviously didn’t matter. He called out Heat guard Tyler Herro after Game 2 because of his lack of defensive fortitude after getting hunted relentlessly at the start of the series.
Anderson wasn’t wrong, either. Without Garland, the Cavaliers obviously closed out the series in emphatic fashion and limited the amount of defenders the Heat could successfully pick on in the halfcourt. They didn’t mismatch hunt well when Garland was on the court anyway, but his absence eliminated that option altogether.
Cleveland outpaced the Heat by 108 points with a 95.2 defensive rating in the series; when he was on the court, it outscored them by only 14 points with a 121.9 defensive rating. The Cavs beat the Heat to a pulp regardless, but it’s fascinating looking at the on-off splits of this microscopic four-game sample. Garland’s a phenomenal lead guard that any team would be lucky to have.
Miami had zero answers for their East foe. None. Zada. It was a demeaning, embarrassing, merciful beatdown for four games, even the first two were competitive at different points. The only competitive parts of Games 3 and 4 were when it was tied 0-0 (and when the Heat had a 16-5 lead in Game 3 … remember that?!)
***
To check out our other content, click here.
Follow Hot Hot Hoops on Twitter/X here!
Follow Hot Hot Hoops on Instagram here!
Subscribe to our YouTube channel here!
- 2024-25 Miami Heat Player Review: Bam Adebayo
- Miami Heat: 1 trait every young player must improve upon
- Heat’s Kel’el Ware makes second-team All-Rookie
- Report: Heat assistant Chris Quinn earns second interview for Suns coaching search
- Report: Heat rival could get in mix for Kevin Durant
- 2025 NBA Draft: 4 prospects Heat should consider trading up for if they fall
- Davion Mitchell says joining the Miami Heat was a “dream come true”
I hearken back to a few years ago, when after a few years that oversaw the dismantling of a previously hopeful Marlins franchise under new ownership, when it was becoming apparent that we accepted him based on his ballplayer record into a GM position he had no abilities to uphold, there was a notable radio silence from one Derek Jeter, who had previously given these polished, but ideas impoverished interviews during his first couple years at the helm. Then he announced he was leaving the job with an excuse that made little sense, essentially blaming others for his inadequacy.
A similar radio silence has descended around Pat Riley, another who going into hiding would seem unlikely. I’m wondering if the ending will come out similar, as the situation is different in many ways except both teams were/are in shambles, but the egos are somewhat aligned.
jeter was handicapped with cheap owners unfair to rip him .riley is just hadicapped 30 not good at his job anymore.nobodys gonna want to play here,unless bam can get somebody.
No, Jeter got paid exorbitantly like the greedy mercenary he turned out to be, making ten million each year he was here and was actually in on the low payrolls idea and preached it to investors as a good idea to get in on the revenue sharing money. They should not be compared except the going into hiding aspect when facing their failures, otherwise Jeter was infinitely worse than anything Riley did. Riley achieved excellence for many years, just lost his edge towards the end, Jeter achieved nothing.